Tessa Johanna Brockmann vs Georgina Groth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent performance shows Groth winning 44.44% of points on their second serve compared to Brockmann's 42.67%. Could this advantage influence the match outcome? Yes, the correlation between second serve points and match predictions is high.
• In return games, Brockmann has a slight edge by winning 51.62% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Groth's 50.31%.
• For first serve returns, Brockmann again leads with 34.81% over Groth's 30.03%, a stat strongly linked to head-to-head match predictions.
• Under pressure, Brockmann excels, saving 48.91% of breakpoints, whereas Groth saves 45.16%, an important figure for live betting considerations.
• Brockmann's recent match win rate over the past year is 66.27%, notably higher than Groth's 55.56%, suggesting better overall performance.
• Groth performs best on hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Brockmann shines on clay at 62%.
• Brockmann competes at a higher tournament level, primarily on Challengers/ITF events > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches compared to Groth's 62.96% in lower-tier events.
• Groth faces stronger opposition with an average opponent ranking of 148.53, whereas Brockmann's average opponent ranks 369.81.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Brockmann is favored, with a win rate of 76% versus Groth's 43% in such scenarios.
• Break point conversion rates are nearly identical, with Groth at 42.86% and Brockmann at 42.05%, crucial for predicting outcomes during high-pressure moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 14, 2025, UTC):

The data reveals significant insights into the likely outcome of the upcoming match between Groth and Brockmann. Groth demonstrates a marginal advantage in second serve points, although Brockmann shows overall superior performance in return games and break point savings.

Brockmann's higher match win rate over the past year and stronger performance in deciding sets provide additional edges. However, Groth competes against tougher opponents, indicating robust competitiveness.

Based on these statistics, while both players have their strengths, Brockmann seems more likely to triumph, given the combination of favorable return stats and superior performance under pressure.